Legal Opinion
Wright v. Traver
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided January 25, 1889PublishedCited by 11 opinions
Error to Gratiot. (Hart, J.) Assumpsit. Defendants bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The plaintiff offered in evidence the following instrument:
“$100.00. St. Louis, Michigan, Feb’ry 4, 1884.
“ On or before the first day of February, 1885, for value received, the undersigned promise to pay A. J. Mowry, or order, at Harrington, Saviers & Co. bank, for machine, and for the right of Grant’s Pat. Hoop Machine, one hundred dollars, with interest at six per cent, per annum from date until due, without relief from valuation or appraisement laws, and with ten per cent, att’y fees. The conditions of this note are, if not paid when due, the property for which it is given shall be the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bullock v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Preston v. WhitneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Cayuga County National Bank v. PurdyMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Altman v. RittershoferMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Altman v. FowlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
3Cited by11 opinions
- Shelling State Bank v. ClasenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- Brooke v. StruthersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- In Re Schafer's BakeriesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1957
- National Cash Register Co. v. PaulMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
- Walker v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.