Legal Opinion
National Cash Register Co. v. Paul
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided March 30, 1921No. Docket No. 134PublishedCited by 15 opinions
Error to Wayne; Webster (Arthur), J. Replevin by the National Cash Register Company against Ralph C. Paul for the possession of a cash register. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.
This case is before this court on writ of error by defendant, to review a judgment for the plaintiff in an action of replevin to recover the *610possession of a certain cash register. The case was tried at the circuit by the court upon the following agreed statement of facts.
“First: On April 4, A. D. 1919, the National Cash Register Company agreed to sell to M. L. Lasley, under a certain so-called Conditional Sale Contract, cash register No. 852 E. L. 1672409 for five hundred fifty dollars ($550.00), payable in monthly installments; that said cash register was delivered to the said M. L. Lasley…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harkness v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Chicago Railway Equipment Co. v. Merchants' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Young v. PhillipsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
- Atkinson v. JapinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Thirlby v. RainbowMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Burroughs Adding MacHine Co. v. WieselbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Peter Schuttler Co. v. GuntherMichigan Supreme Court · 1923
- Federal Commercial & Savings Bank v. International Clay MacHinery Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1925
- Heyman Co. v. BuckMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Contractors Equipment Co. v. ReasnerMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.