Legal Opinion

Maher v. Roisner

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 10, 1953No. 35,811PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Loking, Chief Justice.

This is an action to recover a real estate commission alleged to be due plaintiff as the result of his having produced a buyer who was ready, willing, and able to purchase certain property. A verdict was returned for plaintiff. This appeal is from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial.

During his closing argument defendant’s attorney argued that, although plaintiff claimed to have advertised the property, he had not produced any evidence that the property had been advertised in the newspapers in spite of the fact that such evidence would have been readily…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Reed v. BjornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1934
  2. Ferraro v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
  3. Hammel v. FeighSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
  4. Jeddeloh v. HockenhullSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  5. Prescott v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  2. Brabeck v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  3. Malik v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  4. Randall v. Goodrich-Gamble Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
  5. State v. GuevaraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API