Randall v. Goodrich-Gamble Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
*403Dell, Chibe Justice.
Action by Mae Evelyn Randall for injuries which, she alleges resulted from the application to her ankle of “Hoff’s Liniment,” a compound manufactured and sold by defendant. Her husband, Ira Randall, instituted a companion action for damages resulting to him because of such injuries. The actions, which were tried together, are based on the claim that defendant was negligent in the manufacture and sale of the product.2 The jury returned verdicts for defendant in both cases. These are appeals from orders denying plaintiffs’ motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Livingstone v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939
- Williams v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
- Froden v. RanzenbergerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Willmar Gas Co. Inc. v. DuininckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Holz v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1949
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Meagher v. KavliSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Fenton v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- EOP-Nicollet Mall, L.L.C. v. County of HennepinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- Engel v. StarrySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.