Legal Opinion
Reese v. Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 17, 1967No. 39990PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Sheran, Justice.
Appeal from an order of the district court denying defendants’ motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdict or a new trial.
A Hennepin County jury awarded approximately $21,000 to Herbert Reese, Sr., of Greenbush, Minnesota, to be paid by Ross & Ross Auctioneers, Inc., a corporation, and its employees, Don Marsolais and Percy N. Ross, as damages for a fraud perpetrated in connection with an auction sale held at Thief River Falls, Minnesota, on October 13, 1960. Defendants, acknowledging that the evidence is adequate to sustain the verdict, urge that a new trial should be…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- New York Central Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Ferraro v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Smith v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
- State v. CurrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Harris v. Breezy Point Lodge, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Vangsness v. VangsnessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2000
- Bisbee v. RuppertSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Goblirsch v. Western Land Roller Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Ramfjord v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Eklund v. LundSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.