Legal Opinion
Ferraro v. Taylor
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided March 20, 1936No. 30,758PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Loring, Justice.
In a suit to recover for personal injuries the plaintiff had a verdict against the owner of a rented car, defendant O. H. Gray Auto Livery Service, which has appealed to this court from an order denying its blended motion for judgment or a new trial.
At about 7:30 o’clock in the evening of September 1, 1933, defendant Boy Taylor rented a Ford sedan from the corporate defendant O. H. Gray Auto Livery Service on the “drive yourself” plan. Taylor had proceeded only a short distance from the place where he procured the car when he ascertained that the windshield wiper was out of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Lake v. Atlantic WorksMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1872
- Seith v. Commonwealth Electric Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1909
- Louisville Home Telephone Co. v. GasperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
- Moon v. Northern Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- Watson v. Ky. & Ind. Bridge & Ry Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Boutang v. Twin City Motor Bus Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1956
- Ford Motor Company, a Corporation v. Marvin D. ZahnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1959
- Egan Chevrolet Co. v. BrunerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Sweet v. RingwelskiMichigan Supreme Court · 1961
- Prescott v. SwansonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.