Estate of Budan
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLorigan, J.
This is a contest of a will (after its admission to probate) on the ground of unsoundness of mind of the testator and undue influence.
The case was tried before a jury, and from a verdict and judgment in favor of respondents, and from an order denying their motion for a new trial the contestants appeal.
The points made for reversal are:—
1. It is insisted that the court erred in sustaining objections to questions asked hy contestants of Dr. W. M. Stover, a wit ness called in their behalf. The doctor—a physician—had treated the testator professionally at the San Luis sanitarium from November 25,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kauffman v. MaierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. SuesserCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Carpenter v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Wheelock v. GodfreyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Huyck v. RennieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re Estate of RelphCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Smith v. SpauldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Mehollin v. YsuchiyamaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
- Terhune v. WeiseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Trelut v. KazarianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.