Legal Opinion

Wheelock v. Godfrey

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1893No. 15398PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls, C.

This action was brought to recover by Almon Wheelock, as the executor of the last will of Albert G. Wheelock, the sum of seven thousand and forty-five dollars- and eighty-nine cents, moneys received on deposit by the defendant San Francisco Savings Union from Albert G. Wheelock in his lifetime. Defendants had judgment. Plaintiff thereupon moved *581for a new trial, which motion was denied, and from the order of denial this appeal is taken.

Albert G. Wheelock was a bachelor of the age of say sixty-five years; had been a bank clerk in San Francisco and possessed a fortune worth say fifty…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Webber v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  2. People v. PicoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Fish v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hoyt v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. People v. LongCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  2. City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Estate of KeeganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. People v. ManoogianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API