Legal Opinion
Terhune v. Weise
Washington Supreme Court
Decided January 5, 1925No. 18668. Department TwoPublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
H. B. Yaughn was doing business under the name of the Commercial Plumbing & EEeating Company, in 1922, and being in need of additional funds with which to carry on his business, made an arrangement with the appellant to advance money to him. This agreement was reduced to writing and provided that the appellant should furnish $1,000, or such additional sums as might be desired to be used by Vaughn for the purpose of obtaining materials and supplies and paying for labor upon his plumbing and heating contracts; that, for the use of such money, Weise was to receive, in lieu of interest, the cash…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Twin-Lick Oil Co. v. MarburySupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Hartford Fire Ins. v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1895
- Thompson v. Huron Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1892
- Burne v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Jackson v. FlohrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Seattle Ass'n of Credit Men v. DanielsWashington Supreme Court · 1942
- Hastings v. Continental Food Sales, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1962
- Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. Co. v. DraperCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
- Whiting v. RubinsteinWashington Supreme Court · 1941
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.