Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Bailey

California Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1892No. 14744PublishedCited by 54 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of San Joaquin County, and from an order refusing a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Temple, C.

This is a contest in regard to a will, inaugurated after the will had been probated, and is the second appeal taken by proponents. (79 Cal. 382.) It is from an order revoking the probate of the will, and from an order refusing a new trial.

There have been two trials, each before a jury, and twice the verdict has been to the effect that the decedent was of unsound mind, and that the will was the product of an insane delusion. On the last trial, special issues were submitted, and the jury not only found that the decedent was of unsound mind and under an insane delusion which caused him…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Goodwin v. GoodwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Carpenter v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. People ex rel. Clough v. LevyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. Estate of PerkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Wilson v. McConnachieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Hirshfeld v. DanaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  4. In re Estate of RedfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. People v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API