Legal Opinion

Malouf v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 10, 1911No. 191PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Transferred from United States Circuit Court for Southern District of New York, Abstract 22592 D. ■

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

A certain article of merchandise entered at the port of New York was assessed for duty b}^ the collector as a nonenumerated manufactured article under the provisions of section 6 of the tariff act of July 24, 1897, which reads as follows:

Sec. 6. That there shall be levied, collected, and paid on the importation of all raw or unmanufactured articles, not enumerated or provided for in this act, a duty of ten per centum ad valorem, and on all articles manufactured, in whole or in part, noi provided for in this act, a duty of twenty per centum ad valorem.

The importers protested against the action…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Ishimitsu v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Willits & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  3. Nootka Packing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1935
  4. Atwood-Stone Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  5. Kamikawa Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API