Legal Opinion

Koons v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided December 17, 1924No. 2388PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlaND, Judge

The issue in this case is the classification of beet pulp which is the dried residue from sugar beets after the sugar has been extracted, upon which duty was assessed at the rate of 10 per cent ad valorem, under the provisions of paragraph 384 of the tariff act of 1913 for “waste, not specially provided for.”

The importers protested the classification, claiming that the merchandise was free of duty under the provision in paragraph 552 of said act for “moss, seaweeds, and vegetable substances, crude or unmanufactured, not otherwise specially provided for.” The Board of General Appraisers…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Willits & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. United States v. FuruyaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1917
  3. Darling & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924
  4. Magee v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
  5. United States v. Johns-Manville Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Cheltenham Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  3. George Beurhaus Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  4. Kamikawa Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
  5. Masson v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API