Legal Opinion

Harley Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 8, 1926No. 2703PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge

Rags of cotton and of wool and silk, imported at the port of San Francisco, were classified by the collector of customs as waste and assessed for duty at 10 per centum ad valorem under paragraph 1457 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which paragraph reads as follows:

Par. 1457. Waste, not specially provided for, 10 per centum ad valorem.

The importer protested that the merchandise was free of duty either under paragraph 1516 as waste bagging or under paragraph *1131560 as cotton waste, or under paragraph 1601 as junk, or under paragraph 1651 as rags. The paragraphs or parts thereof upon which the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Latimer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Patton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  3. Dwight v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  4. Willits & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  5. Seeberger v. CastroSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. United States v. Bassichis Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  2. Midwest Waste Material Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  3. Pacific Iron & Metal Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  4. Cheltenham Supply Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. Studner v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API