Legal Opinion

Gardner v. Vic Tanny Compton, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 7, 1960No. Civ. 24111PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VALLÉE, J.

Appeal by plaintiff from an adverse judgment in an action to recover damages for alleged violation of Civil Code, sections 51 and 52. 1

Defendant Vic Tanny Compton, Inc., is a California corporation. On November 3, 1956, plaintiff applied to defendant in writing to take a course in physical training at defendant’s gymnasium in Compton and offered to pay the amount requested for a “course of physical education.” Defendant declined to furnish the course to plaintiff. The sole reason defendant refused was on account of plaintiff’s race and color, and not for reasons applicable “to all…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Williams v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Long v. Mountain View Cemetery Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Piluso v. SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
  5. Coleman v. MiddlestaffAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1957

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Warfield v. Peninsula Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. In Re ZornCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2007
  4. People v. BelangerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  5. Duskin v. State Board of Dry CleanersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API