In Re Zorn
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.
Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as defendant”) seeks a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he is being illegally restrained of his liberty by the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles.
Facts: Defendant entered a plea of guilty on July 16, 1962, to violating section 41.27 (a) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, * in that he did wilfully and unlawfully appear in a state of intoxication in a public place open to public view.
This is the sole question necessary for us to determine : Mas the state adopted a general scheme for the regulation of the criminal aspects of being intoxicated in a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In Re MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- In re KoehneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Gardner v. Vic Tanny Compton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
- Darius v. ApostolosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919
3Cited by40 opinions
- Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Lancaster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Crownover v. MusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.