Legal Opinion

In Re Zorn

California Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1963No. Crim. 7310PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

Petitioner (hereinafter referred to as defendant”) seeks a writ of habeas corpus, claiming that he is being illegally restrained of his liberty by the Chief of Police of the City of Los Angeles.

Facts: Defendant entered a plea of guilty on July 16, 1962, to violating section 41.27 (a) of the Los Angeles Municipal Code, * in that he did wilfully and unlawfully appear in a state of intoxication in a public place open to public view.

This is the sole question necessary for us to determine : Mas the state adopted a general scheme for the regulation of the criminal aspects of being intoxicated in a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re MossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. In re KoehneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Gardner v. Vic Tanny Compton, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1960
  4. Darius v. ApostolosSupreme Court of Colorado · 1919

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. People Ex Rel. Deukmejian v. County of MendocinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  4. Lancaster v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Crownover v. MusickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API