Piluso v. Spencer
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
The action was brought under sections 51 and 52 of the Civil Code for the violation of the “personal rights” of plaintiff. After alleging that one H. W. Pollman was and had been for some time “the keeper and did keep a hotel for the accommodation of lodgers and' travelers” in the town of McCloud, in the county of Siskiyou, and that plaintiff and his wife and child lodged in said hotel from August 14, 1914, until November 20th, paying all of said Pollman’s demands in full for said lodging, the complaint proceeds: “That on or about the 20th day of November, 1914, said H. W. Pollman did…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- Greenberg v. Western Turf Assn.California Supreme Court · 1903
- Pinkerton v. WoodwardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
- Fay v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1892
- Leonard v. FlynnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Marina Point, Ltd. v. WolfsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Burks v. Poppy Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
- Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of Boy Scouts of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Dold v. Outrigger Hotel & Hawaii Hotels Operating Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1972
- Stearns v. Fair Employment Practice CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.