Legal Opinion

Coleman v. Middlestaff

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided January 8, 1957No. Civ. A. No. 9058PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKauffman, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment that plaintiff take nothing, entered after an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint without leave to amend.

Plaintiff, Christopher Coleman, a minor, sued through his guardian ad litem, Ada Coleman, his mother. In the first cause of action the complaint alleged that plaintiff is a Negro and a citizen of the United States; that at all times defendant operated and maintained a dental office in Duarte, California, which was open to the use of the general public, at which defendant offered services for the extraction of teeth among other things;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. James v. Marinship Corp.California Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Williams v. International Brotherhood of BoilermakersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Gaglione v. CoolidgeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Long v. Mountain View Cemetery Assn.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Roberts v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Agnew v. ParksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  2. Isbister v. Boys' Club of Santa Cruz, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Warfield v. Peninsula Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Curran v. Mount Diablo Council of Boy Scouts of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Clarke v. HoekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API