Legal Opinion
National Federation of the Blind v. Target Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided October 2, 2007No. C 06-1802 MHPPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Re: Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and Motion to Bifurcate; Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment
MARILYN HALL PATEL, United States District Judge.
Plaintiffs National Federation of the Blind (“NFB”), National Federation of the Blind of California (“NFB-CA”), Bruce Sexton, and all those similarly situated, filed this action against Target Corporation (“Target”), seeking declaratory, in-junctive and monetary relief. Plaintiffs claim that Target.com is inaccessible to the blind, and thereby violates federal and state laws prohibiting discrimination against the…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Amchem Products, Inc. v. WindsorSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Andrews v. Blick Art Materials, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2017
- Tait v. BSH Home Appliances Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Wilkins-Jones v. County of AlamedaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Cullen v. Netflix, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Munson v. Del Taco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.