Legal Opinion

Curtis v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided February 23, 2004No. 00-632CPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Senior Judge.

In this case, former and current employees of the Naval Surface Warfare Center Division, Crane Division (“NSWCD” or “plaintiffs”) seek recovery for overtime pay and other relief pursuant to the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 207. The matter is now before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss pursuant to the Rules of the Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.1 Alternatively, defendant moves for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, defendant’s motion is DENIED.

Background

Pl…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Christensen v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  2. O'Conner v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  3. Hohnke v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  4. Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
  5. Jaynes v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API