Legal Opinion

O'Conner v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided March 30, 2004No. 00-343CPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MILLER, Judge.

This case is before the court after oral argument on defendant’s second motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, second motion for partial summary judgment. Plaintiffs are covered by a collective bargaining agreement that commits them to binding arbitration of their grievances. Intervening between defendant’s two dispositive motions was an appellate ruling that overturned dismissal of plaintiffs’ claims for lack of jurisdiction, but affirmed this court’s alternate ruling on the merits that certain claims were barred *166by a settlement agreement negotiated by plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Morrison v. Executive Aircraft Refinishing, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2005
  2. Holland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
  3. Madison Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Independence Park Apartments v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2004
  5. Holland v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API