In the Matter of Gilhuly's Petition
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtBbowst, J.
Pursuant to stipulation these seven petitions, which were heard together, for the purposes of this appeal have been consolidated into and treated as one application determined by one judgment. These material facts are disclosed by the finding amended by the single correction to which the defendants are entitled. All seven petitioners prior to October 29th, 1937, had been enrolled on the caucus list of the Democratic party of West Haven for periods varying from three to thirty years respectively. They had been more or less active in political affairs as party workers and campaign contributors…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Norwalk Street Railway Company's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1897
- O'Dea v. AmodeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Marcum v. Ballot Com'rsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1896
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Heimov v. ThomsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
- Walkinshaw v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
- Fishman v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1985
- Thalheim v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Chambers v. Blickle Ford Sales, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.