Legal Opinion

Caruso v. City of Bridgeport

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 5, 2007No. SC 18010PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ROGERS, C. J.

The plaintiff, Christopher Caruso, brought this action pursuant to General Statutes § 9- 329a (a), 1 claiming, inter alia, that the defendant Santa Ayala, the Democratic registrar of voters for the city of Bridgeport (city), had violated certain election statutes before, during and after the September 11, 2007 Democratic primary for the office of the mayor of the city. 2 After an expedited hearing, the trial court rendered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff then brought an appeal pursuant to General Statutes §§ 9-325 3 and 51-199 (b) (5). 4 After the appeal was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bortner v. Town of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Fort Trumbull Conservancy, LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  3. Wrinn v. DunleavySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  4. Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  2. Caruso v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API