Legal Opinion
Caruso v. City of Bridgeport
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 26, 2008No. SC 18012PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROGERS, C. J.
The plaintiff, Christopher Caruso, brought this action pursuant to General Statutes § 9-329a (a), 1 claiming that the defendant Santa Ayala, the Democratic registrar of voters for the city of Bridgeport (city), had violated certain election statutes before and during the September 11, 2007 Democratic primaiy for the office of the mayor of the city. 2 After an expedited hearing, the trial court rendered judgment for the defendants. The plaintiff then brought this appeal 3 claiming that the trial court: (1) improperly determined that certain actions by Ayala did not…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Craig v. DriscollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Rocco v. GarrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Bortner v. Town of WoodbridgeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Dow & Condon, Inc. v. Brookfield Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- King v. SultarSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Bayer v. Showmotion, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Butts v. BysiewiczSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- Burton v. COM'R OF ENV. PROTECTIONSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Hansen v. O'ReillySupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2015
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.