Legal Opinion
Holm v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided December 23, 1977No. 47333PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TODD, Justice.
Rickie L. Holm brought a civil suit against Ernest Converse for injuries he received while being placed under arrest by Converse, a policeman for the then village, now city, of Princeton. Converse died leaving no estate before the judgment in favor of Holm was entered, and Holm obtained from the representative of Converse’s estate an assignment of the right to proceed against Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Company (Mutual), which was the insurer for the village of Princeton. Holm’s subsequent action against Mutual was decided in favor of the insurance company. The trial court…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Kangas v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1975
- Associated Independent Dealers, Inc. v. Mutual Service Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- State v. GardnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
- United States Fire Insurance Co. v. McCormickSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
- Le Blanc v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1943
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- Haagenson v. National Farmers Union Property & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. of Texas v. LindseyTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Continental Western Insurance Co. v. KlugSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Waseca Mutual Insurance Co. v. NoskaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Tlougan v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.