Legal Opinion

Berrata v. Sales

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 13, 1927No. Docket No. 3232PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

— Plaintiff had judgment in an action instituted to prohibit the defendants from enforcing a certain ordinance numbered 284, charter series, entitled, “An ordinance establishing certain districts or zones and regulating the use of property and the location of various industries and business or commercial establishments in the City of Petaluma” and the defendants appeal.

The city of Petaluma is a municipal corporation, operating under a freeholders’ charter, effective in 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 1799).

On November 19, 1923, the city council of the city of Petaluma adopted an ordinance creating a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chase v. TroutCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Park v. Pacific Fire Extinguisher Co.California Court of Appeal · 1918

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  3. Gilgert v. Stockton Port DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Scottsdale v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Taschner v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API