Legal Opinion
Gilgert v. Stockton Port District
California Supreme Court
Decided September 15, 1936No. Sac. 5034PublishedCited by 46 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PULLEN, J., pro tem.
Respondent is the owner and in possession of a piece of real property in the city of Stockton, which properly lies within the exterior boundaries of Stockton Port District. This district is a public corporation created under an act of the legislature entitled “Port District Act, Statutes 1931, Ch. 1028,” and is governed by a board of five commissioners.
The land of Gilgert is located near the deep-water channel of the port of Stockton, and he has negotiated leases with certain oil companies for the erection of tanks upon said land for the storage of petroleum products.
Prior…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- A. L. A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Miller v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Zahn v. Board of Public Works of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Hurst v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by46 opinions
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People Ex Rel. Younger v. County of El DoradoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Johnston v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Morse v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- San Diego Building Contractors Ass'n v. City CouncilCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.