Puritas Coffee & Tea Co. v. De Martini
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, J.
Plaintiff appeals from the judgment following verdict in favor of defendants in this action to recover the purchase price of shelled walnuts.
The complaint alleged that, on January 15, 1919, plaintiff contracted to sell to defendants and1 defendants contracted to purchase of plaintiff 5,507 pounds of broken pieces of walnut meats and 5,002 pounds halves of walnut meats then owned and in the possession of plaintiff, at Los Angeles, at a price of forty cents per pound, or a total of $4,203.60, f. o. b. Los Angeles, and plaintiff agreed to make delivery thereof to defendants by loading the same…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
- J. S. Potts Drug Co. v. BenedictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- People v. SingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Gilfallan v. GilfallanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Katzenbach & Bullock Co. v. BreslauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. WrightIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
- C.O. Bashaw Co. v. A. U. Pinkham Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Modesto Dry Yard, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
- Turlock Merchants & Growers, Inc. v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Modesto Dry Yard, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.