Katzenbach & Bullock Co. v. Breslauer
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, P. J.
This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment against him in an action to recover damages for the breach of a contract by defendant for the purchase of a carload of caustic soda. The findings show that the plaintiff is a New Jersey corporation and filed a copy of its articles of incorporation in the office of the Secretary of State of the state of California, and a certified copy thereof in the office of the county clerk of San Francisco; that the contract sued upon was entered into between the parties for the purchase and sale of a carload of caustic soda at an agreed price, f. o. b.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Rayfield v. Van MeterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Hilmer v. HillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Hewes v. Germain Fruit Co.California Supreme Court · 1895
- Brinkley-Douglas Fruit Co. v. SilmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
- Eads v. KesslerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ross v. Frank W. Dunne Co.California Court of Appeal · 1953
- Gopcevic v. California Packing Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1923
- Bowden v. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Hougham v. RowlandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Alexander v. WallingCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.