Legal Opinion

People v. Sing

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 25, 1919No. Crim. No. 656PublishedCited by 54 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, and from an order denying a new trial. Frank R. Willis, Judge. Affirmed. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of grand larceny. He appeals from the judgment of conviction and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

The information was filed in, and the action tried by, the superior court of Los Angeles County. It is charged in the information that defendant and one St. Clair, “on or about the first day of September, 1918, at and in the county of Los Angeles, . . . did . . . feloniously steal, take, and haul away 252 sacks óf sweet potatoes, . . . the personal property of N. Namekawa, Y. Takahaihi, and K. Yasunaga. ”

Briefly, the evidence discloses the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Blackwood v. Cutting Packing Co.California Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. DelbosCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. People v. StaplesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. People v. RaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Carl v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. GriffinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  2. People v. FerlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. People v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  4. People v. MegladderyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  5. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API