Legal Opinion
City of Indianapolis v. Wright
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided January 19, 1978No. 477 S 272, 777 S 488PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHunter, J.
Cause No. 477S272 was initiated by John Wright and Mary Kay Gilbert, appellees, when, on October 14, 1976, they filed their complaint for a temporary restraining order, permanent injunction and declaratory relief. A temporary restraining order was issued and subsequent to a hearing pursuant to Ind. R. Tr. P. 65 (A) (2), the trial court granted the permanent injunction and the declaratory relief prayed for. The trial court’s judgment determined that the massage parlor ordinance at issue here was unconstitutional. More specifically it found that state law has preempted municipal legislation…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Almeida-Sanchez v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- See v. City of SeattleSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. BiswellSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- James O. Pollard, Etc. v. Lila Cockrell, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- Oriental Health Spa, Its Manager and Employees, and Martha Clampitt D/B/A Tender Touch v. City of Fort WayneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Gora v. City of FerndaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Bayside Enterprises, Inc. v. CarsonDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 1978
- MRM, INC. v. City of DavenportSupreme Court of Iowa · 1980
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.