Legal Opinion

Turlock Merchants & Growers, Inc. v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 13, 1926No. Docket No. 3171PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

The complaint alleges that the defendant is indebted to the plaintiff “on an open book account for goods, wares, and merchandise, and money expended for said defendant of the reasonable value” of $637.17. The answer denies the alleged indebtedness. The defendant filed a cross-complaint in which he alleges that the parties entered into an agreement whereby the defendant appointed the plaintiff “his sole and exclusive agent for selling and distributing all cantaloupes owned or controlled by said defendant . . . for the season of 1921,” the defendant to pay the plaintiff for such services at the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hoge v. GeorgeWyoming Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Gianelli v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Eaton v. BlackburnOregon Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Whitaker v. Dunlap-Morgan Co.California Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Puritas Coffee & Tea Co. v. De MartiniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Pray v. Trower Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
  2. Baker v. J. C. Watson Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Fischer v. First National BankIdaho Supreme Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API