Legal Opinion
In Re Brown
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided January 19, 2006No. 05-BG-564PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
On October 28, 1993, the Maryland Court of Appeals indefinitely suspended the respondent, Timothy Brown, from the practice of law. 1 This discipline was based on a joint petition filed by the respondent and the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland. In that petition, the respondent effectively admitted that (1) he charged his client an excessive fee, (2) he failed to respond to attempts to contact him, (3) he failed to return unearned fees, (4) he failed to put a retainer in a separate trust account, and (5) he failed to respond to the Attorney Grievance Commission’s inquiries regarding…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re GoldsboroughDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1995
- In Re ZdravkovichDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2003
- In Re SlosbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
- In Re MitchellDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1999
- In Re BellerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2002
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- In Re BrownDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006