Legal Opinion

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Fortinberry Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 19, 1949No. 33059PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Per curiam

On February 28, 1938, the Fortinberry Company, Inc., hereinafter designated as plaintiff, filed in the district court of Oklahoma county its petition or application for a writ of mandamus against the Oklahoma Tax Commission.

Plaintiff by its application sought to have the court require the defendant commission to approve and allow a claim presented and filed with defendant by plaintiff for the purchase price of certain bolts and nuts under a contract entered into on May 18, 1937, between the Tax Commission and plaintiff.

Upon the issuance of an alternative writ defendant Oklahoma Tax Commission…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smoot's CaseSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Flynn Construction Co. v. LeiningerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
  3. City of Wilburton v. KingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  4. Lingo-Leeper Lumber Co. v. CarterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
  5. Board of Com'rs of Seminole County v. State Ex Rel.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Marley v. CannonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
  2. Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
  3. City of Hugo v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
  4. Stump v. CheekSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 52 v. HOFMEISTERSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API