Legal Opinion
Marley v. Cannon
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 7, 1980No. 53928, 53991PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
IRWIN, Vice Chief Justice.
This appeal involves the authority of the Oklahoma Securities Commission and the Administrator of the Oklahoma Department of Securities to issue cease and desist orders; and the jurisdiction of the district court to determine whether or not the business activities of an entity fall within the purview of the Oklahoma Securities Act.
Lentz and Associates (appellees) are engaged in the mortgage and loan business. According to appellees, they render two distinct services to desirous borrowers. One involves the preparation of a professional loan package in an effort to…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- McKart v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- McGee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Skinner & Eddy Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Burdick v. Independent School District No. 52Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985
- Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. Oklahoma Department of Central ServicesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2002
- Conoco, Inc. v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- City of Hugo v. State Ex Rel. Public Employees Relations BoardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1994
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.