Legal Opinion
Stump v. Cheek
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided December 12, 2007No. 103,554PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKauger, J.
¶ 1 The question presented is whether the trial court erred in denying the appellant’s motion for attorney fees, costs, and expenses under the Nonjudicial Marketable Title Procedures Act, 12 O.S.2001 § 1141.1 et seq. We find that it did.
FACTS
¶2 This appeal arises from an action to quiet title to a disputed tract of real property located on Grand Lake in Delaware County, Oklahoma. The tract is a 20' x 30' portion of Lot 5, Block 1 of the subdivision of Lake-port, Oklahoma (Disputed Tract).1 On January 28,1947, Lawrence Ousterhout (Ousterh-out) and George Housley (Housley) bought Lot 8, Block 1…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Patel v. OMH Medical Center, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
- Ledbetter v. Oklahoma Alcoholic Beverage Laws Enforcement CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Samman v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Fulsom v. FulsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Welch v. CrowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- White v. HENG LY LIMSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Oklahoma Public Employees Ass'n v. State ex rel. Oklahoma Office of Personnel ManagementSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Crutchfield v. Marine Power Engine Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2009
- Foster v. Merit Energy Co.District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.