Legal Opinion
Flynn Construction Co. v. Leininger
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 1927No. 18405PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This is an original proceeding, which, because of its public importance to road construction throughout the state, has been permitted to be filed in this court for a writ of mandamus compelling the State Highway Commission to pay to plaintiffs the sum. of $6,011.34, alleged to be due plaintiffs for work and labor done and material furnished in the construction of a concrete bridge over Elk river, on State Highway No. 10, in Delaware county, under a contract entered into between plaintiffs and the State Highway Commission for the construction of said bridge.
The only reason assigned for the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Fones Hardware Co. v. ErbSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1891
- Diamond v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Ricketson v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- Hannan v. Bd. of Educ. of City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Williams v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Fortinberry Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- N.E.R.I. Corp. v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Joint School Dist. No. 132 v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1927
- Hill Bros. Const. & Engineering Co. v. MtcMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Leininger v. Ward-Beekman & Brooks, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.