Legal Opinion

Morgan v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 2004No. 02-263PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

[¶ 1] Appellant James Allen Morgan entered a conditional plea of guilty to two counts of possession of marijuana. He reserved his right to appeal the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress the evidence seized during, and as the result of, the search of his disabled vehicle. Specifically, Morgan complains that a drug dog sniff of the exterior of the vehicle was an illegal search under the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and Article 1, Section 4 of the Wyoming Constitution. He also claims the State failed to establish the reliability of the canine.…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  2. United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. United States v. JacobsenSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Kyllo v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. Silverman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  2. Kunselman v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Flood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Lindsay v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Custer v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API