Legal Opinion
Meadows v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
Decided March 13, 2003No. 01-241, 01-242PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HILL, Chief Justice.
[¶ 1] Charles David Furman (Furman) and Jennifer Lynn Meadows (Meadows) (collectively Appellants) each entered conditional guilty pleas pursuant to W.R.Cr.P. 11(a)(2) to one count of knowingly or intentionally possessing a controlled substance in excess of three grams in violation of Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 35-7-1031(c) (LexisNexis 2001), a felony pursuant to § 35 — 7—1031(c) (ii). Appellants’ guilty pleas were conditioned on this appeal of the district court’s denial of their motions to suppress.
[¶ 2] We affirm.
ISSUES
[¶ 3] In Case Number 01-242, Furman presents a single issue…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- United States v. HensleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Vale v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- State v. BinetteTennessee Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- O'BOYLE v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
- Campbell v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Morgan v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
- Flood v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2007
- Rideout v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2005
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.