Legal Opinion
United States v. Funds From Prudential Securities
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 28, 2005No. CIV.A.00-3046(RMU)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
URBINA, District Judge.
Granting the Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Decree for Forfeiture
I. INTRODUCTION
This in rem civil forfeiture 1 matter comes before the court on the United States’s (“government” or “plaintiff’) motion for summary judgment and decree for forfeiture. On December 21, 2000, the plaintiff filed a verified complaint for forfeiture in rem for Latonya Curtis’s (“claimant”) funds seized in August 2000. Specifically, the plaintiff seized $41,059.86 2 in financial account funds and a $50.00 money order to enforce the provisions of 21 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. All Assets Held at Bank Julius Bank Julius Baer & Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- United States v. PalfreyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Cornell v. KellnerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Santini v. TaylorDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Garfield Taylor IncorporatedDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.