Legal Opinion
United States Securities and Exchange Commission v. Garfield Taylor Incorporated
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 28, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2011-2054PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Granting Plaintiff’s Request for Civil Monetary Penalties Against Certain Defendants and Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Proposed Final Judgment
RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court are Plaintiff United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (“the Commission”) request that the Court assess civil monetary penalties against defaulted Defendants Garfield Taylor, Inc. (“GTI”), Gibraltar Asset Management Group, LLC (“GAM”), and Jeffrey A. King (“King”) (ECF No. 32) and the Commission’s motion for entry of a proposed final judgment as to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. First City Financial Corporation, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kenton Capital, Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 1998
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. WhittemoreCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2011
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. LevineDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Milan Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sec. & Exch. Comm'n v. RielDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2017
- U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. E-Smart Technologies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2016