Legal Opinion
Cornell v. Kellner
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 25, 2008No. Civil Action 06-1924 (GK)PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Dan R. Cornell, an Arizona resident, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Russell Kellner and Gerald Carter, Revenue Officers for the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and “4 or 5 John Doe” federal employees 1 (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging various causes of action under the Fifth Amendment and other statutes. 2 This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint [Dkt. No. 4]. Upon consideration of the Motion, Opposition, Reply, and the entire record herein, and for the reasons stated…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Keeton v. Hustler Magazine, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- GTE New Media Services Inc. v. BellSouth Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2000
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Navab-Safavi v. Broadcasting Board of GovernorsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Kissi v. PanzerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Baez v. ConnellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Bond v. ATSI/JACKSONVILLE JOB CORPS CENTERDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Khan v. Gramercy Advisors, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.