Legal Opinion
Santini v. Taylor
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 27, 2008No. Civil Action 06-1970 (GK)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.
Plaintiff Maureen Santini, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Jeffrey A. Taylor, United States Attorney, and Daniel J. Metcalf, Director of the Department of Justice’s Office of Information and Privacy 1 alleging violations of the Freedom of Information Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552 and the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 701-706. This matter is before the Court on Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, for Summary Judgment [Dkt. No. 12]. Upon consideration of the Motion, Opposition, Reply, and the entire record…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Leatherman v. Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence and Coordination UnitSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Grand Lodge of the Fraternal Order of Police v. AshcroftDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2001
- Jarrell v. TischDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1987
- In Re Swine Flu Immunization Products Liability Litigation. Linda Kenneda v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hines v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Friends of the River v. United States Army Corps of EngineersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Grand Marina Investors, LLC v. U.S. Internal Revenue ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Hines v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Khalid v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.