Legal Opinion
Romain v. Pebble Creek Partners
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided September 18, 1981No. 51380PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SIMONETT, Justice.
In this declaratory judgment action the district court found a purchase agreement was not governed by the notice of contract cancellation requirement of Minn.Stat. § 559.21 (1978) and that the agreement came to an end by its own terms. In addition, the trial court awarded sellers, as the prevailing parties, their deposition expenses as taxable costs. Purchasers appeal from these two rulings. We affirm.
Pebble Creek Partners bought an apartment complex in Brooklyn Park, made improvements, and put it on the market for sale. Joseph E. Romain and Michael T. Murray were interested…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Independent Iron Works, Inc. v. United States Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- Chemical Bank v. KimmelDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1975
- Koppinger v. Cullen-Schiltz & AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1975
- Liebsch v. AbbottSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Domtar, Inc. v. Niagara Fire Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Kellar v. Von HoltumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Striebel v. Minnesota State High School LeagueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- TNT Properties, Ltd. v. Tri-Star Developers LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.