Legal Opinion

Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided April 27, 1984No. C7-82-520, C9-82-390PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

The Anoka County District Court entered a summary judgment for respondents in these cases, relying on statutory exceptions to the state’s tort liability under the Tort Claims Act, Minn.Stat. § 3.736 (1982). One exception provides immunity from suit for “[a]ny loss caused by the performance or failure to perform a discretionary duty, whether or not the discretion is abused.” Minn.Stat. § 3.736, subd. 3(b). The second exception immunizes the state from “[a]ny loss arising out of the construction, operation, or maintenance of the outdoor recreation system, as defined in section…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Romain v. Pebble Creek PartnersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  2. Dukowitz v. Hannon Security ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  3. Sirek v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  4. Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
  5. Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API