Green-Glo Turf Farms, Inc. v. State
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
WAHL, Justice.
The Anoka County District Court entered a summary judgment for respondents in these cases, relying on statutory exceptions to the state’s tort liability under the Tort Claims Act, Minn.Stat. § 3.736 (1982). One exception provides immunity from suit for “[a]ny loss caused by the performance or failure to perform a discretionary duty, whether or not the discretion is abused.” Minn.Stat. § 3.736, subd. 3(b). The second exception immunizes the state from “[a]ny loss arising out of the construction, operation, or maintenance of the outdoor recreation system, as defined in section…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Romain v. Pebble Creek PartnersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by29 opinions
- Lienhard v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Dukowitz v. Hannon Security ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
- Sirek v. State, Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
- Larson v. Hill's Heating & Refrigeration of Bemidji, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.