Legal Opinion
Striebel v. Minnesota State High School League
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 9, 1982No. 51940, 52042PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS, Justice.
Appellant Striebel challenges, on equal protection grounds, the constitutionality of Minn.Stat. § 126.21, subd. 5 (1980), authorizing separate seasons of play for high school athletic teams separated or substantially separated according to sex. The trial court determined that the lack of adequate tennis and swimming facilities made it necessary to schedule these sports in two seasons, and that separating the teams by sex was a reasonable means of achieving maximum participation by both sexes in the high school athletic program. It concluded that the policy of the Minnesota State…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Alabama State Federation of Labor v. McAdorySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Attorney General v. Massachusetts Interscholastic Athletic Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Donald M. Gomes v. Rhode Island Interscholastic LeagueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1979
- Romain v. Pebble Creek PartnersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Portz v. St. Cloud State Univ. & Minn. State Colls. & UniversitiesDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2018
- Department of Civil Rights Ex Rel. Forton v. Waterford Township Department of Parks & RecreationMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Lake Superior Center Authority v. Hammel, Green & Abrahamson, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. WolfSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Benson v. Northwest Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.