Fulwider v. Ingels
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Howard Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the Court
Bicknell, C. C.
The appellee, as the guardian of John McQuiston, a person of unsound mind, brought this suit to set aside an exchange of lands, agreed upon and partially completed by McQuiston and his wife. The complaint averred that the defendants.William A. Fulwider, Judith Fulwider and Cynthia E. Armfield were the owners of 142 acres of land, and agreed with McQuiston to convey the same to him for $1,800 .in money and a conveyance to them by him of 120 acres of his lands; that, on the 19th of August, 1880, said conveyances were executed and said $1,800 was paid, but by the contract there…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Reissner v. OxleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Bissot v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati & St. Louis Railroad v. NoelIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
- Kenworthy v. WilliamsIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
- Greer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. FalveyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Hull v. LouthIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Hartford v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Muncie Pulp Co. v. KeeslingIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.