Hull v. Louth
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Tippecanoe Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtZollars, J.
Appellant instituted this suit to recover judgment on a promissory note, and to foreclose a mortgage securing the same. The note and mortgage were executed by appellee Henry C. Taylor, on the 2d day of May, 1877. Emma J. Taylor and Emanuel Eichholtz were made parties *317■defendants to the suit, the averment in the complaint as to them being that they claimed some interest in, or lien upon, the real estate described in the mortgage.
Upon the petition of Clark Louth, as guardian of Emma J. Taylor, he was let in to make a defence, and filed an answer in which he alleged that in 1862, Chesebrough…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Powers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- Ikerd v. BeaversIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Somers v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Dennis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Musselman v. CravensIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- McCoy v. AbleIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Hormann v. HartmetzIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Midland Railway Co. v. DickasonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
- Chicago & South Eastern Railway Co. v. State, ex rel. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
- Barner v. BaylessIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.