Reissner v. Oxley
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Marion Superior Court.
1Opinion of the CourtWoods, J.
— The appellees obtained a judgment against the appellants for the recovery of possession of personal property. The appellant Reissner, by virtue of an execution issued to him as sheriff, had levied upon the articles in question us the goods of Everett & Homan, the execution defendants ; and the disputed point in the case was, whether the goods, in fact, belonged to Everett & Homan, or to the appellees, Oxley & Giddings.
The evidence shows that the appellees, who were wholesale dealers in gas fixtures and like goods, in New York City, entered into a contract for supplying their goods to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Etting v. Bank of United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
- Bell's Administratrix v. GoldingIndiana Supreme Court · 1866
- Prather v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
- Bates v. DehavenIndiana Supreme Court · 1858
- Conwell v. PumphreyIndiana Supreme Court · 1857
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by72 opinions
- City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
- Willcuts v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
- South Tippecanoe School Building Corp. v. Shambaugh & Son, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Huntington Mutual Insurance v. WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. GossettIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.