Legal Opinion

Muncie Pulp Co. v. Keesling

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided February 21, 1906No. 20,597PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From Randolph Circuit Court; John W. Macy, Judge. Action by Henry C. Keesling against the Muncie Pulp Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. Transferred from Appellate Court under §1337u Burns 1901, Acts 1901, p. 590.

1Opinion of the CourtJordan, J.

—This action was originally commenced by appellee against appellant in .the Delaware Circuit Court to recover damages for injuries sustained to his premises, attributed to the pollution by appellant of a certain stream of water known as Buck creek.

The complaint is in two paragraphs, each of which was held to be sufficient on demurrer for want of facts. The answer of appellant was a general denial and the statute of limitations. On change of venue the cause was tried by a jury in the Randolph Circuit Court, and a verdict returned in favor of appellee, awarding him damages in the sum of $4,000.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Watts v. Norfolk & W. R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. EberleIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Cline v. LindseyIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Swift v. BroylesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HolcombIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Bartley v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Steinbarger v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Aufderheide v. FulkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Hodges v. Pine Product Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910
  5. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad v. HoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1914

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API