Legal Opinion
Davis v. JOSEPH J. MAGNOLIA, INC.
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 2009No. Civ. Action 08-290 (EGS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Blyden A. Davis has filed discrimination and retaliation claims against defendant Joseph J. Magnolia, Inc., his former employer, pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”), D.C.Code § 2-1401.01 et seq. After conducting limited discovery, the parties filed cross-motions for summary judgment on the question of whether they entered a binding agreement to arbitrate plaintiffs claims. Upon consideration of the motions, the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Nanosolutions, LLC v. PrajzaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Shatteen v. Omni Hotels Management CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Mitchell v. Craftworks Restaurants & Breweries, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Moree v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Nanosolutions, LLC v. PrajzaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.